name | Amanita taiepa |
name status | nomen acceptum |
author | G. S. Ridl. |
english name | "Fenced Amanita" |
images |
1. Amanita taiepa 2. Amanita taiepa 3. Amanita taiepa 4. Amanita taiepa 5. Amanita taiepa 6. Amanita taiepa 7. Amanita taiepa 8. Amanita taiepa 9. Amanita taiepa 10. Amanita taiepa 11. Amanita taiepa 12. Amanita taiepa 13. Amanita taiepa, Waimekamiri Rest Area, Canterbury, New Zealand. (RET 367-4). 14. Amanita taiepa |
intro |
Permission to quote extensively from the original description of this species (1991) was granted by its author, Dr. Geoffrey Ridley. The name is Maori for "fence" and refers to the limbate volva on the stem's basal bulb. |
cap |
Amanita taiepa has a cap that is 14 - 76 mm wide and convex to planar. Its colors range from dark buff, vinaceous buff, or smoky gray in the center to pale yellow or buff at the margin, occasionally fawn. The cap is viscid when young or wet. The margin of the cap can be striate for up to 15% of the cap radius. The flesh of the cap is largely white with pale yellow to grayish buff below the cap's skin. The volva on the cap is white to buff and may take the form of "membranous scales and/or scattered floccose scurf"; it is occasionally absent. |
gills |
The gills of this species are free to narrowly attached, crowded, and white. They are 5 - 12 mm wide with a buff margin. Short gills are truncate to subtruncate to attenuate. |
stem |
The stem is 30 - 110 × 4 - 14 mm with a prominent, white, bulbous base up to 34 mm wide. The stem is pale buff to honey or occasionally ochreous and smooth. There may be floccose fibrils near the top of the stem and some fine scales near the stem base. Infrequently the stem is viscid. The interior of the stem is hollow with flesh ranging from white to pale yellow. The volva on the bulb is in the form of an irregular limb. |
odor/taste |
Odor and taste were not reported for this species. |
spores |
The spores of this species measure 7.5 - 12 × 7.5 - 12 µm according to the original description and are globose to subglobose to (less frequently) broadly ellipsoid and inamyloid. RET's spore measurements from one paratype and from the Shirley collection are as follows: (7.5-) 8.4 - 10.6 (-11.8) × (6.1-) 7.0 - 8.6 (-9.5) µm; and nearly all spores were subglobose to broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid. More than half of the spores measured were broadly ellipsoid. Clamps are present, but may be difficult to detect at the bases of basidia according to the original description. |
discussion |
Amanita taiepa is found only in New Zealand in association with Nothofagus, Leptospermum, and Kunzea. With regard to Karl Soop's photo (immediately above, upper) the yellow in the pileus and stipe, which clearly affects the external appearance of those parts of the mushroom seems to arise in the flesh. Since this is rather unusual in Amanita, it may be worth examing the possibility that this is related to the yellowing syndrome, which is usually seen in species of sect. Lepidella [see A. subsolitara (Murrll) Murrill].—R. E. Tulloss |
brief editors | RET |
name | Amanita taiepa | ||||||||||||||||
author | G. S. Ridl. 1991. Austral. Syst. Bot. 4: 328, fig. 2(a-i). | ||||||||||||||||
name status | nomen acceptum | ||||||||||||||||
english name | "Fenced Amanita" | ||||||||||||||||
synonyms |
=Amanita vaginata var. umbrinolutea "(Secr.) Gilb." sensu Stevenson (1962) p.p.
=Amanita vaginata var. umbrinolutea "(Secr.) Gilb." sensu Taylor (1970). The editors of this site owe a great debt to Dr. Cornelis Bas whose famous cigar box files of Amanita nomenclatural information gathered over three or more decades were made available to RET for computerization and make up the lion's share of the nomenclatural information presented on this site. | ||||||||||||||||
etymology | taiepa (Maori), "fence"—referring to the fence-like volval limb | ||||||||||||||||
MycoBank nos. | 355192 | ||||||||||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||||||||||
holotypes | PDD | ||||||||||||||||
intro |
The following text may make multiple use of each data field. The field may contain magenta text presenting data from a type study and/or revision of other original material cited in the protolog of the present taxon. Macroscopic descriptions in magenta are a combination of data from the protolog and additional observations made on the exiccata during revision of the cited original material. The same field may also contain black text, which is data from a revision of the present taxon (including non-type material and/or material not cited in the protolog). Paragraphs of black text will be labeled if further subdivision of this text is appropriate. Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text where data is missing or uncertain. The following material is predominantly based on the protolog (Ridley 1991). Additional data (as indicated below) is based on original research by R. E. Tulloss. Basidiomes very small to medium. | ||||||||||||||||
pileus | 14 - 76 mm, plano-convex to plano-depressed, with disc dark buff, vinaceous buff, or smoky grey, paling to pale yellow or buff at margin, occasionally with slightly fawn appearance, viscid when young or wet, drying with age; context predominantly white, pale luteus to greyish buff beneath pileipellis; margin sulcate (0.10 - 0.15 R), entire; universal veil white to buff, as membranous scales, and/or scattered floccose scurf, occasionally lacking. | ||||||||||||||||
lamellae | free, crowded, white, 5 - 12 mm broad, with edge entire to laciniate and buff; lamellulae subtruncate to attenuate. | ||||||||||||||||
stipe | 30 - 110 × 4 - 24 mm, pale buff to honey, occasionally ochreous, smooth, or with floccose fibrils near apex, becoming finely scaled towards base, rarely viscid; bulb up to 34 mm wide, white to buff, subtomentose; context white to pale luteous, hollow above bulb; exannulate; universal veil as small free membranous limb. | ||||||||||||||||
pileipellis |
From the protolog (Ridley 1991): 35 - 100 µm thick, with suprapellis slightly gelatinised, with subpellis not gelatinized. RET: vascular hyphae present. | ||||||||||||||||
pileus context | RET: vascular hyphae 3.5 - 6.1 μm wide, sinuous, ??. | ||||||||||||||||
basidia | 42 - 78 × 10 - 14.5 µm, 4-spored, occasionally 1- to 3-spored; clamps present (but often difficult to see). | ||||||||||||||||
universal veil | On pileus: hyphae often finely encrusted, irregularly arranged; inflated cells abundant, long, hyaline, up to 214 × 34 µm; clamps present. On stipe base: not described. | ||||||||||||||||
lamella edge tissue | inflated cells small, easily disarticulated, globose to ellipsoid to clavate, hyaline, 16 - 46 × 6.5 - 20 µm. | ||||||||||||||||
basidiospores |
From the protolog (Ridley 1991): [261/16/-] 7.5 - 12.0 × 7.5 - 12.0 µm, (Q = 1.0 - 1.25; Q' = 1.03), hyaline, thin-walled, inamyloid, globose to subglobose to broadly ellipsoid; apiculus not described; contents not described; white in deposit. RET: [80/4/2] (7.5-) 8.4 - 10.8 (-13.1) × (6.1-) 7.0 - 8.7 (-9.5) μm, (L = 8.9 - 10.0 μm; L’ = 9.5 μm; W = 8.0 - 8.2 μm; W’ = 8.1 μm; Q = (1.05-) 1.07 - 1.32 (-1.57); Q = 1.10 - 1.25; Q’ = 1.19), hyaline, colorless, smooth, thin-walled, inamyloid, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, adaxially flattened; apiculus sublateral, cylindric or (infrequently) truncate-conic; contents mono- or multiguttulate, often with plentiful additional small granules, infrequently granulate; color in deposit not recorded. | ||||||||||||||||
ecology |
From the protolog (Ridley 1991): Solitary to subgregarious. Under Nothofagus fusca, N. truncata, N. solandri var. solandri, Leptospermum scoparium and Kunzea ericoides. Known from the North Island, New Zealand. RET: Canterbury: Under Nothofagus. Auckland: With Kauri (Agathis australis), Leptospermum, and mixed indigenous scrub. | ||||||||||||||||
material examined |
From the protolog (Ridley 1991): NEW ZEALAND: AUCKLAND─Auckland City, Birkenhead, Kauri Pk., 30.v.1971 B. S. Parris & P. Croxall s.n. (paratype, PDD 29054); Waitakere Range, Goldie’s Bush, 9.v.1971 B. S. Parris s.n. (paratype, PPD 29053).
WELLINGTON—Eastbourne, Muritai Pk., 29.iii.1958 M. Bulmer s.n. [G. Stevenson 1271b] (paratype, K); Day’s Bay, William’s Pk., 14.iv.1979 G. Stevenson 79/88 (paratype, CHR); Rimutaka For. Pk., Orongorongo Track, 18.iii.1987, S. Brodie s.n. [G. S. Ridley 314] (holotype, PDD 56152); Rimutaka For. Pk., Orongorongo Valley, Paua Ridge, 18.iii.1987 G. S. Ridley 319 (paratype, PDD 56153). RET: NEW ZEALAND: AUCKLAND—Northcote, Kauri Glen Reserve, 16.v.2009 C. Shirley CSAK337 (in herb. C. Shirley; RET 453-3). CANTERBURY—Waimekamiri Rest Area, 21.iv.1997 Karl Soop KS-AA21 (RET 367-4). WELLINGTON—Eastbourne, Muritai Pk., 29.iii.1958 M. Bulmer s.n. [G. Stevenson 1271A] p.p. (K 36095, mixed collection). | ||||||||||||||||
discussion |
t.b.d. Stevenson 1271A is a paratype of A. pekeoides; the packet, however, contains mixed material including a specimen of the present species. | ||||||||||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss | ||||||||||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
name | Amanita taiepa |
name status | nomen acceptum |
author | G. S. Ridl. |
english name | "Fenced Amanita" |
images |
1. Amanita taiepa 2. Amanita taiepa 3. Amanita taiepa 4. Amanita taiepa 5. Amanita taiepa 6. Amanita taiepa 7. Amanita taiepa 8. Amanita taiepa 9. Amanita taiepa 10. Amanita taiepa 11. Amanita taiepa 12. Amanita taiepa 13. Amanita taiepa, Waimekamiri Rest Area, Canterbury, New Zealand. (RET 367-4). 14. Amanita taiepa |
photo |
Karl Soop - (13) specimen with yellow stipe flesh, New Zealand, identified in field by Dr. G. S. Ridley. Clive Shirley - (1-12, 14) Auckland, New Zealand. [Full size images of Clives photos can be seen on the Mushroom Observer web site (observations 21065 and 20730). |
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.