name | Amanita sp-AUS11 | ||||||||||||
author | Tulloss & Kudzma | ||||||||||||
name status | cryptonomen temporarium | ||||||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||||||
intro |
The following text may make multiple use of each
data field. The field may contain magenta text presenting data from a type study and/or revision of other original material cited in the protolog of the present taxon. Macroscopic descriptions in magenta are a combination of data from the protolog and additional observations made on the exiccata during revision of the cited original material. The same field may also contain black text, which is data from a revision of the present taxon (including non-type material and/or material not cited in the protolog). Paragraphs of black text will be labeled if further subdivision of this text is appropriate. Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text where data is missing or uncertain. The following material is based on notes and photographs of the collector, molecular studies by Dr. L. V. Kudzma and other original research of R. E. Tulloss. | ||||||||||||
pileus | 107 - 125 mm wide, brownish gray or olive gray over marginal striations, light to moderate gray and slightly virgate elsewhere; context white, ?? mm thick over stipe; margin nonappendiculate, distinctly tuberculate striate (0.3R), decurved; universal veil as white membranous patch in material examined, not discoloring. | ||||||||||||
lamellae | free, close, pale orangish cream in side view, marginate with distinct orangish gray material on gill edge, ??; lamellulae truncate, to rounded truncate, to subtruncate, common, of diverse lengths, unevenly distributed. | ||||||||||||
stipe | 179 - 207 × 15 - 17 mm, at first gray, with expansion becoming gray punctate on upper stipe surface and having orangish gray to dark gray flame/snakeskin/zebroid pattern below (becoming darker toward stipe base), with white ground color, narrowing upward, flaring at apex; context white, ??; exannulate; universal veil as saccate volva, white, membranous, not discoloring, persistent, 41 - 69 × 31 mm, flaring upward rather evenly. | ||||||||||||
odor/taste | neither recorded. | ||||||||||||
macrochemical tests |
none recorded. | ||||||||||||
lamella edge tissue | sterile. | ||||||||||||
ecology | A pair. At 94 m elev. In semi-rainforest. | ||||||||||||
material examined | AUSTRALIA: NEW SOUTH WALES—Yarrahapinni St. For., N. of Grassy Head [30.7816° S/ 152.982° E, 94 m], 28.iii.2015 Ian Dodd s.n. [mushroomobserver #202936] (RET 688-2; nrITS & nrLSU seq'd.). | ||||||||||||
discussion | This is another Australian species of section Vaginatae with the unusual 5' motif (5'-TCTGACCTCAAATCA) for the nrLSU sequence. For a list of other taxa of the world with this motif, see the discussion data field for A. penetratrix. | ||||||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss and L. V. Kudzma | ||||||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
name | Amanita sp-AUS11 |
name status | cryptonomen temporarium |
author | Tulloss & Kudzma |
images |
1. Amanita sp-AUS11, Yarrahapinni St. For., NSW, Australia. s; (RET 688-2) 2. Amanita sp-AUS11, Yarrahapinni St. For., NSW, Australia. s; (RET 688-2) 3. Amanita sp-AUS11, Yarrahapinni St. For., NSW, Australia. s; (RET 688-2) 4. Amanita sp-AUS11, Yarrahapinni St. For., NSW, Australia. s; (RET 688-2) 5. Amanita sp-AUS11, Yarrahapinni St. For., NSW, Australia. s; (RET 688-2) 6. Amanita sp-AUS11, Yarrahapinni St. For., NSW, Australia. s; (RET 688-2) |
photo |
Ian Dodd - (1-6) Yarrahapinni State Forest, New
South Wales, Australia. (RET 688-2) [Note: Orignal and untrimmed images can be viewed here.—ed.] |
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.