name | Amanita aurorae | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
name status | cryptonomen temporarium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
english name | double click in markup mode to edit. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
intro |
Olive text indicates a specimen that
has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for
microscopic details) and marks other places in the text
where data is missing or uncertain. The following material is derived from photographs and notes of the collector, molecular research of Dr. L. V. Kudzma and other original research of R. E. Tulloss. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
odor/taste | neither recorded. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
macrochemical tests |
none recorded. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
partial veil | not present. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lamella edge tissue | sterile. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ecology | Ontario, Canada: In mixed woods with Quercus rubra, Acer saccharum, and Betula papyrifera. Florida, U.S.A.: In office park landscaping with mostly Quercus and Lagerstroemia. Texas, U.S.A.: In sandy soil of forest including Quercus and Pinus. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
material examined | CANADA: ONTARIO—Port Cover, lynn Valley Rd. & Haldimand Rd. 70 [42.8380° N/ 80.1211° W, 201 m], 30 viii.2018 Eva Skivic s.n. [mushroomobserver #330370] (RET 841-5, nrITS-LSU seq'd.). Roseneath, Peter's Woods Prov. Nat. Reserve, 15.vii.2014 Jan Thornhill s.n. (RET 637-3, nrITS & nrLSU seq'd.). U.S.A.: FLORIDA—Leon Co. - Tallahassee [30.4264º N/ 84.2847º W, 62 m],15.vi.2017 Russell de Grove 2-092106 (RET 782-8, nrITS-LSU seq'd.), 22.vi.2017 R. de Grove s.n. [mushroomobserver #279764] (RET 783-7, nrITS-LSU seq'd.); unkn. loc., 15.vi.2017 Russell de Grove 3-151449-092128 (RET 782-4, nrITS-LSU seq'd.); unkn. loc., 15.vi.2017 Russell de Grove 4-145103 (RET 782-9), nrITS-LSU seq'd.). TEXAS—Tyler Co. - Big Thicket Nat. Preserve - North Turkey Creek Unit [30°36.164’ N/ 94°20.913’ W, 45.1 m], 11.vi.2015 Ronald L. Pastorino 6-11-14K [mushroomobserver #168799] (RET 629-2, nrITS & nrLSU seq'd.). WISCONSIN—Walworth Co., Lulu Lake St. Natural Area [42.8362° N/ 88.4525° W, 252 m], 2.ix.2018 Andrew Khitsun s.n. [mushroomobserver #331731] (RET 850-7, nrITS-LSU seq'd.). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
discussion |
The Ontario material (RET 637-3) was briefly treated on the present site as "Amanita sp-pseudocrocea02." The species has been more recently treated under the names "A. sp-F20" and "A. sp-T47." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss and Linas Kudzma | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
name | Amanita aurorae |
name status | cryptonomen temporarium |
author | Tulloss, R. L. Pastorino, S. D. Russell & Kudzma |
english name | double click in markup mode to edit. |
images |
1. Amanita aurorae, Big Thicket Nat. Preserve, Tyler Co., Texas, USA. (RET 629-2) 2. Amanita aurorae, Big Thicket Nat. Preserve, Tyler Co., Texas, USA. (RET 629-2) 3. Amanita aurorae, Lulu Lake St. Natural Area, Walworth County, Wisconsin, USA. (RET 850-7) 4. Amanita aurorae, aging, Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, USA. (RET 783-7) 5. Amanita aurorae, Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, USA. (RET 783-6) |
photo | Ronald L. Pastorino - (1) Big Thicket National Preserve, Tyler County, Texas, U.S.A. (RET 629-2) [Note: Original images can be found here.] |
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.