name | Amanita albosquamosa |
name status | nomen acceptum |
author | A. E. Wood |
english name | "White Blanket Lepidella" |
intro | The following is largely based on the original description (Wood 1997). |
cap | The cap of Amanita albosquamosa is up to 100 mm wide, convex then plano-convex or plane, smooth, dry, white to pale cream at the center, with a nonstriate and slightly appendiculate margin. Small or large volval remains are present as white or pale cream patches and flat membranous scales, sometimes slightly thickened. |
gills | The gills are free, moderately crowded, thin, deep cream, with a white and serrate edge. The short gills are present in at least two series. |
stem |
The stem is up to 100 × 10 mm, white, and powdery over the whole surface. The ring is fragile, powdery, and never clearly present. The base is bulbous to top-shaped, white. Wood describes the volva as vague ridges on the upper part. We think it is more likely that the powdery covering of the stem is remains of an internal limb of a volva than remains of a powdery "ring." |
spores |
The spores measure (8.7-) 9.0 - 11.1 (-12.0) × 6.9 - 8.4 (-9.0) µm and are broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid and amyloid. Clamps are uncommon at bases of basidia, when found they are quite distinct. |
discussion |
Wood describes the mushroom as occurring in sclerophyll forests and "tall open forests" from the state of New South Wales, Australia. A sclerophyll forest in the Australian bush is a forest of hard-leaved plants including Eucalyptus in the overstory (wikipedia). Given the evidence provided in the original description, this species is probably correctly placed in stirps Grossa. —R. E. Tulloss and L. Possiel |
brief editors | RET |
name | Amanita albosquamosa | ||||||||
author | A. E. Wood. 1997. Austral. Syst. Bot. 10: 794, fig. 37(a-e). | ||||||||
name status | nomen acceptum | ||||||||
english name | "White Blanket Lepidella" | ||||||||
MycoBank nos. | 443196 | ||||||||
GenBank nos. |
Due to delays in data processing at GenBank, some accession numbers may lead to unreleased (pending) pages.
These pages will eventually be made live, so try again later.
| ||||||||
holotypes | UNSW | ||||||||
intro |
The following text may make multiple use of each data field. The field may contain magenta text presenting data from a type study and/or revision of other original material cited in the protolog of the present taxon. Macroscopic descriptions in magenta are a combination of data from the protolog and additional observations made on the exiccata during revision of the cited original material. The same field may also contain black text, which is data from a revision of the present taxon (including non-type material and/or material not cited in the protolog). Paragraphs of black text will be labeled if further subdivision of this text is appropriate. Olive text indicates a specimen that has not been thoroughly examined (for example, for microscopic details) and marks other places in the text where data is missing or uncertain. The following material is based entirely on the protolog of this species, which does not meet contemporary standards for Amanita taxonomy. | ||||||||
basidiospores |
from the protolog: [-/-/-] (8.7-) 9.0 - 11.1 (-12.0) × 6.9 - 8.4 (-9.0) μm, (Q = 1.25 - 1.38), amyloid, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid. [Note: Data provided is not sufficient to permit generation of a sporograph.—ed.] | ||||||||
ecology | In sclerophyll forest. | ||||||||
material examined |
from the protolog: AUSTRALIA: NEW SOUTH WALES—Sydney, Cumberland St. For., | ||||||||
citations | —R. E. Tulloss | ||||||||
editors | RET | ||||||||
Information to support the viewer in reading the content of "technical" tabs can be found here.
name | Amanita albosquamosa |
bottom links |
[ Keys & Checklists ] [ Australia/New Zealand List ] |
name | Amanita albosquamosa |
bottom links |
[ Keys & Checklists ] [ Australia/New Zealand List ] |
Each spore data set is intended to comprise a set of measurements from a single specimen made by a single observer; and explanations prepared for this site talk about specimen-observer pairs associated with each data set. Combining more data into a single data set is non-optimal because it obscures observer differences (which may be valuable for instructional purposes, for example) and may obscure instances in which a single collection inadvertently contains a mixture of taxa.